Negative effect is favorable
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.
Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT)
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2022
Effects shown in research
Child health
Findings rated high
808
Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT)
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accelerated weight gain |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
253 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.32 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.34 | Difference = -0.02 | HomVEE calculated = -0.05 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.97 |
|
Accelerated weight gain |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
16 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
269 infants | Unadjusted proportion = 0.09 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.12 | Difference = -0.03 | HomVEE calculated = -0.19 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.44 |
Negative effect is favorableNegative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
BMI |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
253 children | Unadjusted mean = 17.00 | Unadjusted mean = 17.40 | Mean difference = -0.40 | HomVEE calculated = -0.28 | Statistically significant, p = 0.02 |
HomVEE calculated significanceStatistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
BMI |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
16 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
269 children | Unadjusted mean = 16.40 | Unadjusted mean = 16.80 | Mean difference = -0.40 | HomVEE calculated = -0.27 | Statistically significant, p = 0.03 |
HomVEE calculated significanceStatistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
BMI |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
243 children | Unadjusted mean = 16.50 | Unadjusted mean = 16.80 | Mean difference = -0.30 | HomVEE calculated = -0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.10 |
HomVEE calculated significanceStatistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
BMI |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
28 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
262 children | Unadjusted mean = 17.10 | Unadjusted mean = 17.70 | Mean difference = -0.60 | HomVEE calculated = -0.39 | Statistically significant, p <.01 |
HomVEE calculated significanceStatistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
BMI |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
232 children | Unadjusted mean = 15.80 | Unadjusted mean = 16.20 | Mean difference = -0.40 | HomVEE calculated = -0.32 | Statistically significant, p = 0.02 |
HomVEE calculated significanceStatistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
BMI |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
279 children | Unadjusted mean = 13.80 | Unadjusted mean = 14.30 | Mean difference = -0.50 | HomVEE calculated = -0.43 | Statistically significant, p <.01 |
HomVEE calculated significanceStatistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
BMI |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
40 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
259 children | Unadjusted mean = 17.30 | Unadjusted mean = 17.80 | Mean difference = -0.50 | HomVEE calculated = -0.33 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 |
HomVEE calculated significanceStatistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
BMI (in standardized units) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
243 children | Unadjusted mean = -0.09 | Unadjusted mean = 0.11 | Mean difference = -0.20 | Study reported = -0.21 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.10 |
Author-reported effect size was calculated as mean difference between standardized scores. |
BMI (in standardized units) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
232 children | Unadjusted mean = -0.13 | Unadjusted mean = 0.15 | Mean difference = -0.28 | Study reported = -0.28 | Statistically significant, p= 0.04 |
Author-reported effect size was calculated as mean difference between standardized scores. |
BMI percentile |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
243 children | Unadjusted mean = 48.10 | Unadjusted mean = 52.40 | Mean difference = -4.30 | HomVEE calculated = -0.15 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.26 |
|
BMI percentile |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
232 children | Unadjusted mean = 46.90 | Unadjusted mean = 53.80 | Mean difference = -6.90 | HomVEE calculated = -0.24 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.07 |
|
Conditional weight gain |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
28 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
262 children | Unadjusted mean = -0.18 | Unadjusted mean = 0.18 | Mean difference = -0.36 | Not available | Statistically significant, p <.01 |
Negative effect is favorableNegative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Downward crossing of 2 major percentile lines for height and weight |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
279 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.02 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.04 | Difference = -0.01 | HomVEE calculated = -0.32 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.47 |
Negative effect is favorableNegative effect is favorable to the intervention. HomVEE calculated significanceStatistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Percent obese |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
243 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.01 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.08 | Difference = -0.08 | HomVEE calculated = -1.47 | Statistically significant, p= 0.01 |
Negative effect is favorableNegative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Percent obese |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
232 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.03 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.08 | Difference = -0.05 | HomVEE calculated = -0.70 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.08 |
Negative effect is favorableNegative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Percent overweight |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
243 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.11 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.21 | Difference = -0.09 | HomVEE calculated = -0.43 | Statistically significant, p= 0.04 |
Negative effect is favorableNegative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Percent overweight |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
232 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.11 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.20 | Difference = -0.09 | HomVEE calculated = -0.41 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.07 |
Negative effect is favorableNegative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Weight-for-age below 5th percentile |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
3 years old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
279 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.08 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.04 | Difference = 0.04 | HomVEE calculated = 0.39 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.22 |
Negative effect is favorableNegative effect is favorable to the intervention. HomVEE calculated significanceStatistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
808
Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT)
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daytime sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
245 infants | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p >.05 |
|
Daytime sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
16 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
262 infants | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p >.05 |
|
Daytime sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
40 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
251 infants | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p >.05 |
|
Daytime sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
8 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
252 infants | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p >.05 |
|
Overnight sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
245 infants | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p >.05 |
|
Overnight sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
16 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
262 infants | Unadjusted mean = 582.10 | Unadjusted mean = 557.20 | Difference = 24.90 | HomVEE calculated = 0.31 | Statistically significant, p= 0.01 |
|
Overnight sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
40 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
251 infants | Unadjusted mean = 624.60 | Unadjusted mean = 602.90 | Difference = 21.70 | HomVEE calculated = 0.30 | Statistically significant, p= 0.01 |
|
Overnight sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
8 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
252 infants | Unadjusted mean = 532.30 | Unadjusted mean = 497.20 | Difference = 35.10 | HomVEE calculated = 0.42 | Statistically significant, p <.01 |
|
Sleep 12 to 14 hours per day |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
245 infants | Not reported | Not reported | Odds ratio = 1.89 | HomVEE calculated = 0.38 | Not statistically significant, p >.05 |
Effect size based on study ORHomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Total daily sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
16 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
262 infants | Unadjusted mean = 808.80 | Unadjusted mean = 785.30 | Difference = 23.50 | HomVEE calculated = 0.21 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.08 |
|
Total daily sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
40 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
251 infants | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p >.05 |
|
Total daily sleep duration (minutes) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
8 weeks old |
INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample |
248 infants | Unadjusted mean = 866.30 | Unadjusted mean = 839.20 | Difference = 27.10 | HomVEE calculated = 0.20 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.10 |